This week’s post from Kaylen Tucker is a good one; at least, it certainly has resonated with me. I am a big fan of quitting (as you may have noticed). Being smart about your career–academic or otherwise–is, as Kenny says, about knowing when to fold ‘em, hold ‘em, walk away, and when to run. But it also means being okay with the fact that some people will judge you for ditching, including your own harshest critic: you.
I knew virtually no one when I moved to a tiny Midwestern town to start my M.A. program, so I made it my business to make some friends fast. Before long, I had a cluster of friends, and I was settling into the coursework and the rhythm of things. Halfway through the first semester I checked on one of my new friends and found out that she was moving back to Atlanta. She said that graduate school just wasn’t for her and that she was going home.
I was shocked. She didn’t even give it the whole semester, let alone the whole year. I tried not to judge her, with her talk about pursuing another career and missing her boyfriend back home. But the truth is that I kinda thought she was a quitter. And not in a good way.
Now I know that it’s OK to quit. In fact, Seth Godin, author of The Dip: A Little Book That Teaches When to Quit (and When to Stick) and a bunch of other motivation-type books, says that all the most successful people quit often. Though I must admit, when a friend of mine recommended that I read Godin’s book about quitting, the Q word offended me, and I wasn’t sure what to expect.
What I got was a common sense explanation of why it’s OK to quit and why my friend from Atlanta was pretty smart to realize early on that the academic game wasn’t for her and to move on to something else. Though his book is written mostly for business-entrepreneur types, a lot of his points resonate with the academic leaver, especially when he describes recognizing when you’re in what he calls a dip, a cul-de-sac, or a cliff, and how to strategically quit.
Godin’s advice is that if you’re just in the dip—or the hardest part of any challenge—you must press on. A cul-de-sac, on the other hand, describes a dead-end situation where no matter what you do you cannot succeed. A cliff describes a situation in which proceeding would virtually destroy you in the process. Godin argues that if you are in a cul-de-sac or on a cliff, you must quit because you will never succeed at the undertaking. Of course, the very idea of what it means to succeed is tricky to determine. But it’s easy to follow Godin’s logic that if you don’t think that you can ultimately be successful at something without destroying yourself in the process, you shouldn’t hold on just for the sake of not being a quitter.
You may also realize that you are in a dip, and that you have decided that you are no longer interested in achieving the success that is on the other side. Only you can decide if the journey is worth getting through the dip—or if you are in fact in a cul-de-sac or a cliff. I have a friend who decided that after finishing her dissertation and earning her Ph.D.in political science—which is getting through a very big dip—she just didn’t have it in her to do what she called “Going West” again. Going West for my friend represented risking it all and making huge investments that might not pay off, chasing the tenure-track dream and likely ending up somewhere undesirable in the process. She didn’t want to make any more sacrifices in the name of the Ivory Tower. So she decided to strategically quit academia, earning the Ph.D. and not pursuing a tenure-track position. Instead she developed a career in public policy research. I, too, strategically left academia after pushing through the dissertation dip.
The bottom line is that you have to give yourself permission to move on. Ignore feelings of self-contempt and take comfort in the idea that the most successful people in the world quit to go on to be the best at something else.
Kaylen Tucker, Ph.D., is a communications professional based in Maryland who is working to bridge the gap between academia and the world beyond it.
Okay, so, now that the story of my job search has a happy ending (i.e. a fantastic job with an amazing health-based organization serving women in the province of Ontario), I can share some of my less happy moments during my job search. I write about these as cautionary tales for those of you who are anxious to make the most of the opportunities you have (in information interviews, job interviews, and so on).
First, there was the time I applied for a writer/editor position for a very interesting health-related non-profit. In my application, I made sure to emphasize as much as I could that I was detail-oriented, my editing work was meticulous, and so forth. Of course, I failed to actually exercise that meticulousness in my own application. Just as my finger was pressing the “enter” key, sending off my email to the HR manager, I realized the version of my resume that I sent actually had a small typo (something had gotten bumped down to the next line). Nooooo!
I didn’t know what to do. For about an hour, I tried my best to forget about it. But then my type-A personality went into high gear. I wrote a follow-up note to the HR director, indicating my previous resume had a typo. I reattached the cleaned up resume. The good part? I got an interview. The bad part? I made reference, at the interview, to my cover letter–but when I glanced over at the HR manager’s package of my stuff, I realized she didn’t HAVE my cover letter–only my explanatory note about the typo! I didn’t get the job (which was for the best), but I didn’t dare speculate why.
Then there was the time when I finally scored a long sought-after meeting with the executive director of a non-profit organization supporting women that was, at that point, by far my number one choice of employer. I studied the website inside and out, I made enquiries to third parties about the organization, I thought about contributions I could make. When I finally arrived at the meeting, I felt excited and prepared. But sitting down in the board room with the ED, I suddenly realized…I could smell my own nail polish. In a last dash to add some, well, polish to my look, I had slapped on a coat of quick-dry, blood red nail polish. But oooooh nooooo! The acrylic smell was radiating from me–or so I feared, in the middle of this otherwise fairly seamless conversation. (In that instance, there was no job currently on offer–the meeting was sort of a “get to know you” as a result of a mutual acquaintance passing on my resume. Still, I’ll never know if my nail polish would have lost me a job there!).
I also had a few moments in which I probably appeared to be not unlike a desparate dater out at a speed dating event. There was one particular conference that I attended for the purpose of networking–and yet I completely failed to adhere to my own advice about networking. Instead of just chatting with people, getting to know their work, and finding ways that I could help them, I actually would introduce myself to people as a job hunter. There are times when I’m convinced this is the right thing to do, but there are other times when it displays a lack of confidence. I left that event feeling like I had made few genuine contacts–the kind that actually count when you’re trying to network in an effective way.
But I do have one more anecdote that is meant to show you that, even when you do slightly inappropriate things during your job search, it doesn’t necessarily mean you’re doomed. I had had my eye on the organization that eventually hired me for a little while, and I was aware that they were going to be represented at a health-based trade show. I decided to get media accreditation for the trade show (thanks, blogging!) and use that as an opportunity to schmooze with the women from the organization.
So I did just that. I got my media credentials, I went to the trade show, I found the booth where this organization was stationed. Then I walked up to them and…started talking nonsense. I had not prepared in advance what I was going to say, or how I should introduce myself, or how I should actually leverage that opportunity. Instead, I just blundered in with my big ol’ personality, and left feel a little sheepish.
As it turned out, of course, it was handy to be able to mention in my cover letter, which I wrote a week or two later, that I had met the hiring manager at the trade show. Moreover, my big ol’ personality was not something that detracted from my candidacy, but actually strengthened it.
Things have been pretty quiet around these parts since the holidays. I’ve got a good reason for that, though. Remember back in November when I revealed that I was throwing in the freelance towel and had decided to look for a job? Well, I’ve got good news. After four solid months of actively job searching, I landed myself a shiny new full-time job…and I love it.
I started last week as a policy analyst at a women’s health-based, not-for-profit organization, and I could not be more thrilled. This is EXACTLY the type of job that I’ve been looking for: one that perfectly marries my skills with my values.
Although I won’t be discussing the job itself until I really get my feet wet, I can tell you a little bit about the process of getting it. I make no bones about the fact that I worked my butt off to get a job of this calibre. It was a hard slog. The unemployment rate in Toronto right now is around 10%, and there were some days when I despaired I’d never get a job (sound familiar?). But I also put my heart and soul into my search. Here are my stats:
Number of jobs applied for between August 24th and Dec 24th: 24
Number of job interviews: 2
Number of meetings with employers as a direct result of networking: 1
Number of formal networking events attended: 1
Number of conferences attended to meet potential employers: 3
Number of recruiters registered with: 1
Number of information interviews conducted: 19
Number of information interviewees who became friends: 1
Number of friends who helped with my job search: 18
Number of family members: 3
Number of social media platforms leveraged: 4
Number of job boards I routinely checked: 5
Number of different versions of my resume I now have: countless
Some people have asked me what would happen to Leaving Academia once I got a full-time job, and I can tell you that I haven’t decided 100%. One thing I know for sure is that I’m shuttering the consulting side of the project. The Toronto-based meetups will continue, I’m sure, with or without me (and there’s a fresh on this Tuesday at 6:00 pm! Details to follow!). And I am still writing my Leaving Academia column for Inside Higher Ed.
But the blog? I don’t know. I won’t be taking it down, because I know it’s still serving as a great resource for hundreds of people every day. But for me, it has served its purpose (as I’ve taken to saying, it was in no small part a “teacher, teach thyself” kind of project). It’s a project I am readying to move along and away from.
So perhaps it’s time to turn it over to you, the readers. Maybe I can turn it into a group blog, written and edited by a handful of you who are also interested in sharing this kind of information. Or perhaps I can find other ways of inserting user-generated content, like guest posts. Have any ideas? Would you be interested in helping keep the site alive? Leave a comment or flip me an email.
Finally, I just want to say to all of you academic leavers and possible academic leavers out there: don’t give up. I finished my PhD three and a half years ago, and though the time between now and then has been important and significant (I, um, had a baby and all!), it’s only now that I know I’m on the professional path that I really, really want to be on. This pattern is not unusual. So in your dark moments of total fear and uncertainty, please do know that, like I always say, if you were smart enough to get into a PhD program, you’re smart enough to get out.
I was just reading about Films That Move, a film series staged here in Toronto that:
creates a friendly space to bring people together and share ways to make our communities better.
We invite people of all ages and backgrounds to our free movie screenings. This includes education, non-profit, communications and government communities – all are welcome.
Each screening features a community focus, and provides opportunities to participate in sustainable partnership.
The film they’re screening next week is called Lemonade, about advertising professionals who got laid off and subsequently turned their lives around. I haven’t seen it, but I’m a sucker for inspirational shiz like this, so I thought it was appropriate for a Friday posting.
Man, these former-academic-bloggers are just coming out of the woodwork now, aren’t they? Here’s Tony Funk, a man with three university degrees under his belt who became The Accidental Agrarian. His tales about farming and raising animals in British Columbia kinda remind me of former academic Jo Van Every. Jo supports researchers–and yes, I mean those of you who are struggling to finish your dissertations, or land funding for your project, or figure out how to push through that last chapter of your book. Like Tony, Jo lives on a farm with her partner and child, and they raise animals. I’ll spare you the details of all that is involved when you’re living cheek by jowl with nature, and let Jo share that with you instead.
Then there are the people out there who may make you feel a little less alone, like the tenure track prof who suddenly feels like bailing. There’s also the very interesting discussion about using the recession as an excuse to bail from academia. But you can’t have a link roundup without the slightly more jaundiced view, this time from an economist talking to humanities folks.
If you saw my column that went up yesterday at Inside Higher Ed, you’ll know that I claim to have never met “a single former academic who was able to apply their research directly into a non-academic job.” But in only the short span between writing that piece and the publication of it, my claim may now be untrue.
Last week I had the opportunity to meet Alexandra Samuel, the CEO of Social Signal, a company she runs out of Vancouver that helps organizations with their social media needs. She was making this presentation at a symposium we both were attending on health care organizations, knowledge translation and social media.
Turns out Alexandra has a Ph.D. in political science from Harvard, and wrote her dissertation on hacktivism. The company’s website (and it sure is a pretty one) actually says that their methodology comes from Alexandra’s dissertation research. Yes, you read that right: the scholarly work that this Ph.D. did is actually instrumental to the kind of work conducted by the company she runs. Here’s me, eating my words.
And, oh, yeah. Turns out she’s also worked with Robert Putnam (yeah, that one) and Angus Reid. And she’s got 2 kids. And her business partner is her marital partner. And she’s nice and funny, to boot. GAH.
Do you know of other scholars who’ve translated their scholarly research–and I mean their research, not the skills they’ve garnered–into their post-academic work?
My latest post at Inside Higher Ed is on the topic of using social media in your post-academic job search. I don’t want to repeat what I wrote there, but I am going to give some excerpts (with permission-and with important details changed) from an email I received from grey, a regular commenter here who happens to be a client. Grey has been having a lot of success with LinkedIn and Facebook for her post-academic job search. She says:
My experiences with networking & social media … in the last 3 days!
I went through my resume and checked to see if anybody I worked with anywhere was on LinkedIn. Two people (both senior to me) from my tech days at [Big Time University] were, and they not only accepted my connections but immediately sent notes asking what I was up to, etc. (I wish I had done this *before* applying to work at the same company!).
I also looked up the companies I applied to or am applying to to see if I had connections. Turns out a friend from high school’s younger sister was at [Cool Company] for years; he and I are Facebook friends, so messaged him and asked him to put me in touch with his sister, and he said he would.
I found someone else through joining alumni groups at LinkedIn–my high school and college groups. I also discovered that my cousin turns out to have a couple friends from college at [Big Name Company], so I asked him if he would put us in touch.
Facebook has been really useful too. I learned from LinkedIn that a high school friend (my junior prom date, actually) has a job doing what I want to do. I sent him an email (and I got his email from being Facebook friends).
Another high school Facebook friend has been enormously generous. I had messaged him re: selling bike shoes & mentioned I was looking for work. He’s a director of [Doing Nifty Things], which is another way in to the kind of stuff I’m interested in. He immediately offered to do whatever he could – and has been unbelievably helpful – brainstorming ways I could come up with ways that would be valuable to hirers and offering strategies & reading my resume!
By the way – I heard back from my advisor and he’s putting me in touch with [So-and-So].
I also tried a cold email last week to [Wowza Company] in [my city] re: an info interview. The guy I emailed sent my address on to someone else who transitioned from a doctoral program to [that sector] – and he wrote me the friendliest email ever offering to chat about his experiences.
I’m also curious about what others are doing for money during the career search. I started a mini-business doing cleaning, errands, organization. But I’m curious about whether people have creative one-shot stuff.
Job hunting software: Brazen Careerist also has some comments about various software programs for job hunts – I’m following up on your suggestions to put something like this in place to track contacts.
This is fun! And, overall, people have been *enormously* responsive. The *only* thing I’ve sent out and not gotten a response on was a cold email to a radio producer at the local NPR station. But people have been SO generous and happy to talk.
How have you been using social media, dear readers? Do you have a LinkedIn profile yet? How have you leveraged Facebook? Are you networking with your fellow post-academics at the Leaving Academia Ning site? Are you following me on Twitter (sabinehikel)?
(P.S.: I like my social media to be very compartmentalized, so I only use Facebook for in-the-flesh friends and connections and LinkedIn for people I’ve worked with or am angling to work with, so if I turn down your request to connect, know that it is not at all personal. It’s just, as the kids say, how I roll).
Because I am a TOTAL SUCKER for this kind of inspirational stuff, I’m going to pass on this awesome motivational video I saw on Facebook yesterday. Come on, a minute and sixteen seconds of time for a valuable reminder about life? That’s good value.
I just found out about a faaabulous career source that is sooo relevant to the kind of career transition stuff you may be mulling over right now. Prepare yourself for many hours of trawling.
The site is called ICould, and, as their tagline says, “It just shows what you could do.” It features videos of different people talking about their jobs and their career trajectories. What’s really great for the post-academic community is that there is s a search engine where you can actually search for people’s stories by degree attained. As of today, the search engine turned up 118 hits for people with postgraduate or professional qualification.
And as if to verify my own ardent belief that your career trajectory is in no way limited by your area of study, the first vid (okay, the only vid) I watched was with Helen Toland, who has a Ph.D. in biochemical engineering and now works as a radio producer for the BBC — a job that she loves (and yes, she sweated it out in a coffee shop for a year before she wormed her way into the BBC).
So check out ICould and let me know if there are any stories that really get your pulse racing. I found this link, incidentally, from a blog authored by Evelyne Jardin called Docteurs & Co. It’s a French language blog that’s associated with the Association Bernard Gregory, a magazine published in France that’s oriented at Ph.D.s transitioning into the private sector. Although the blog is only in French, the magazine has an English language edition. It is chock full of really juicy information. Evelyne and I have been communicating by email for over a year now (and keep missing each other by phone, where I shall inflict my terrible French on her). Yesterday, Evelyne gave us a shoutout, and that’s where I found out about ICould.
In many respects, I was an unlikely academic leaver. I had some modest success as a grad student (though no one was going to mistake me for a rock star). I had won a SSHRC scholarship (which, in Canada, is a real feather in your cap) to fund 2 years of my research. I’d won OGS scholarships twice (also quite the feather in your cap in the province of Ontario). I’d had a few publications (though none in major journals). I received strong teaching evaluations from students. I’d had an exceptionally supportive dissertation supervisor. I passed my thesis defence with no revisions. I worked on my entire degree very steadily, completing my coursework, comprehensive exams and dissertation all within the time alloted–5 years and 8 months, total. And I kind of had a bit of a life outside of academia, too, manging to meet and marry a lovely non-academic dude (I’d had a personal rule about never dating academics, which turned out nicely for me).
But, as so many post-academics I’ve spoken to since have testified to, I just wasn’t happy. And this sincerely seemed to me to be a sufficient reason to quit the profession and try something else. So I never went on the academic job market. To me, by the final year (though it had been building up in the years prior to that), I was pretty certain that academia was not the right fit for me.
The thing that scared me most about leaving was the possibility that things would get better if I landed a tenure-track position. This was the thought that vexed me most. What if it was the conditions of grad school itself, or my grad program, that caused so much anxiety, stress and uncertainty? Maybe everything would be better once I got to that hallowed faculty post.
What I know now, though, is that the fantastical academic dream is no longer an option for the average junior faculty member. You know that dream: the one where you get to be the kind of teacher Robin Williams was in Dead Poets Society, and where you get to contribute great scholarship to the world, and where you host incredible dinner parties for the faculty and grad students in your spacious dining room. You know: the life of the mind and all of its pleasures. Of course, Robin Williams never had to deal with piles of marking, extreme self-doubt about his research, the constant cycle of applying for external funding (and academics think they’re not trained in marketing! Ha!), or a hostile work environment.
I knew that I loved writing…but my academic writing voice had choked out my creative voice. I knew that I loved research…but I hated the idea of being boxed in to my one area of specialization, when I so often just wanted to bugger off and explore other, equal fascinating areas of scholarship. I loved teaching (when I knew I was really clicking with the students)…but I disliked the university-as-job-factory mentality that made them look at me in the same way they looked at a person delivering a pizza (which isn’t to disrespect pizza delivery persons–gawd knows how much I rely on them–but it is to say that I was a service-delivery provider to them, rather than a teacher, educator, instructor, or, in some cases, a human being).
What was very difficult for me to cope with was the constant pressure of thinking about my research 24/7. An academic’s job–no matter where you are on the totem pole, from grad student to tenured prof–is never done. I know there are a lot of other jobs where late nights are required, or doing a bit of work on the weekends is an expectation. But those expectations are understood by everyone involved, and usually lead to tangible outcomes (e.g. the LaffItOff report gets written; the big presentation to the Dinglebopper Group is ready to go for Monday). There is something I found about the hamster wheel nature of the academic lifestyle that was just, to me, totally dissatisfying.
But the thing that was the apex of what I could not tolerate was the knowledge that what I was doing was making no positive social contribution at all. It was this, most of all, that led me to ditch academia. The idea that I would be on a hamster wheel of research that was totally irrelevant, that would never be read by the public (let alone have any meaningful impact on the public), was intolerable. That was the opposite of why I had gone into graduate school in the first place.
When you’re thinking of leaving academia, there are a mountain of fears to face: what if I can’t get a job doing something else? I don’t even know what my other options are! What else could I possibly do with my life? What if leaving is a terrible decision that I regret for the rest of my life? Can I come back if I leave? What will my supervisor think? What will my friends think? My parents will be so disappointed! I can’t leave–I’m useless!
But against those fears were, for me, some basic truths: I wasn’t happy. I wasn’t living up to my creative potential. I wasn’t being an agent of change.
So leaving had to happen. And it did. And I am so thankful for it. And the fears? Pish-posh! Suddenly, I was too busy being happy, creative and a change agent to even give them any more mind.
An interview with Doug Peers, associate vice-president graduate and dean of graduate studies at York University, on why academics should consider the life of an administrator. […]
Talk of ending journalism school at CU-Boulder is latest effort to transform such programs, suggesting the only way to build them anew is to tear them down. […]
A large California community college district has gotten rid of all of its emergency notification boxes to save money -- a move not yet commonplace despite boom in cell phone usage. […]
RT @brianlbaker: Seriously, I'll take ANY full-time job, with benefits, within a 100-250 mile radius of Fresno, that pays $35,000+. Cont ... 2010/06/14
What is it with the past couple of days and all this, like, EMOTION? 2010/06/11
RT @alysonschafer: LGBT students hear anti-gay slurs an average of 26 times a day. 30 % of suicides are LGBT. Support is here: http:// ... 2010/06/08