From the category archives:

Career planning

In this week’s installment, Kaylen Tucker reminds us all that exploring the world of post-academic life can actually be kinda fun:

When green graduate students used to ask me advice about how to get through the Ph.D. program with dignity and sanity intact—you know the conversation that is fraught with tears when people are on the verge—I’d often give them a pep talk that ended with them needing to put this grad school thing in perspective. I have found that graduate students in general need to loosen up a bit. In their Herculean efforts to succeed they—more than other categories of post graduates—have a hard time letting go.

Law students notoriously party hard. Grad students—not so much. Except for those MFA candidates; they were always starting out at a “workshop” and ending up at the bar. Or workshopping in a bar. English grad students, on the other hand, group up to go to department pot lucks or to book readings. These activities do not count as letting loose and getting a life.

I blame the inability to get a life on the fact that there is no natural break until the Ph.D. is in hand. Every summer break, weekend, holiday, and snow catastrophe feels like another opportunity to catch up on reading or get through those edits. And if you continue down the tenure track, then there’s the next article or book chapter to worry about.  One is never off duty. Five o’clock never comes.

But back to my point: Graduate students—in general, and especially those who are plotting their escape from the academy—need to get a life because it not only will help their physical and emotional health, but it will also go a long way toward  positioning them for a post-academic career.

Here’s how getting a life helped me: I went out more and was generally more social, which some people call networking. And because I was sometimes bored and often broke, I was always looking for a job. And I didn’t limit myself to assistantships which never seemed to pay enough money for all the hours I was putting in grading, preparing, and conferencing with students. I opened myself up to opportunities that seemed fun and interesting, even if they weren’t the traditional pathways to the tenure track. I also took advantage of the fact that I was subsidized and took entry level positions just for the experience. Here’s a sampling of some of the jobs/experiences I had while I was a graduate student:

  • Alumni fundraising
  • Museum docent
  • Taught summer academic enrichment to middle school students
  • Box office manager for a theater company
  • Editorial assistant for a science journal
  • Programming for an education non profit and for a university department
  • Public relations for an entertainment firm
  • Spent a month learning Spanish in Barcelona
  • A host of freelance writing and research projects

These experiences helped me immensely when I decided that I wanted to join the un-academic work force for reals. So, while I was getting a life, I had time to think about what I liked (editing, writing, research, association work, and supporting the arts) and what I didn’t like (working with young children and calling people asking them for money). If I had stuck with the party line, I would have only acquired a narrow category of research and teaching experience. Which is a good thing to have, but not if you have decided that you do not want to teach.

It’s never too late to start getting a life, and developing interests and skills outside of the academy. The point is to resist being overly measured and plotting every point (as you’ve no doubt been conditioned to do). Instead, take some chances, using wide, messy brush strokes to venture outside of your comfort zone.

Kaylen Tucker, Ph.D., is a communications professional based in Maryland who is working to bridge the gap between academia and the world beyond it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 2 comments }

In Kaylen Tucker’s first Leaving Academia post, an ultra-awkward exchange with a well-meaning but clueless professor becomes fodder for post-academic career planning:

When I was applying for dissertation fellowships, I asked a friendly and accomplished professor in my department to help me write a winning statement of purpose. She patiently helped me to fine tune my application and when our session was complete, I felt that I had a real chance at being selected. She reminded me, however, about how very competitive these kinds of things were, and cautioned me not to get my hopes up and to come up with another plan should I not land a post. As a seasoned graduate student, I of course, had a lot of pots simmering. I wasn’t offended, thinking it good, sound advice. But the advice that she gave me next has kept me up at night and has influenced the way I think about the value of a humanities Ph.D.

She asked me if I was looking for a job. I wasn’t, but as one who was accustomed to hustling, always looking for the next thing, I wanted to hear what she had to offer. “Have you heard of Trendy and Terribly Overpriced New Shoe Store?” I told her that I’d been in that store many times. I was confused  … but  curious. “Well, I know the owner,” she continued, “and they’re looking for help. If you’re interested, I could put in a good word for you.”

I should have told her that I didn’t need her help greasing the wheels to gain a retail job. Though I’m bad at math and standing for long periods of time, I think I could have handled that on my own.

I’ve replayed that moment in my head many times, trying to work through the lingering bad taste in my mouth. I finally realized that my irritation wasn’t solely based on her offer to help me get a job that I felt was beneath me instead of helping me figure out a more academic/professional Plan B. No, my exasperation stemmed from the fact that her advice, which I admit was offered innocently enough and in the kindest of spirits, reflected the overall attitude of the department: Academia in narrowly defined terms is everything, and if it doesn’t work out for you—which it probably won’t—there is nothing. If you don’t receive an appointment at University X, you should take your Ph.D. and wait tables or sell shoes until the stars align correctly for you. Nothing against shoes, or those who sell them, but it’s not that black and white, or yellow and blue, or whatever converse combination you fancy. Education is supposed to broaden horizons, not narrow them. So I politely declined the opportunity and resolved to carve my own path.

Well, I didn’t get the fellowship. But I’m not selling shoes either. By the time I finished my Ph.D. in English literature, and after two years of no bites on the academic market, I had decided to pursue another course. I couldn’t commit to another round of the overwhelming job-market process; I was no longer willing to follow the market to whatever city it led me; and I couldn’t stomach the requisite string of adjunct and visiting positions to hold me over until I could land the perfect tenure-track position. What I needed was stability—financial and emotional. I also wanted to feel like I was contributing knowledge to the world, which is why I started the Ph.D. process in the first place. So doing communications for a national education non-profit was a logical next step. My position required me to research, analyze, write, and edit—tasks I had been well trained for.

However, preparing myself for a non-academic job didn’t happen overnight, and I’m still working on fine tuning my mission and figuring out a way to bridge my research interests with my actual job. It’s an ongoing process. But I hope to offer Leaving Academia readers what I have learned about how smart people can figure out a way to harness their power and tackle the world outside of academia.

Kaylen Tucker, Ph.D., is a communications professional based in Maryland who is working to bridge the gap between academia and the world beyond it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 0 comments }

Picture 12I just wanted to make sure that those of you who are on the non-academic and academic job markets know about  Interfolio. Its main strengths seem to play best to those doing a high-level or academic job search, since one of its key functions is managing and shepherding along your letters of reference. If your campus career centre doesn’t already do this, the service is a great way to get your letters out without constantly nagging your referees. There is also a document-sharing feature, so if you need a quick, tidy way of, say, getting copies of your dissertation out to people, this would be ideal.

But it could be beneficial to those focussing on a non-academic search: one really nifty thing it offers is a portfolio option, which essentially is a web page with nice, clean layout that helps you establish your online identity. This is something that job hunters inside academia and out can really benefit from. If you don’t have the chutzpah to set up a blog or the skills/money to establish a website, getting set up on Interfolio would be a great way for you to have a professional presence online. Of course, this is the main reason why I’m not using Interfolio, ’cause I don’t need much help in that regard! But perhaps you do, readers.

How are you managing your online presence?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 2 comments }

Picture 11Here’s another use of effective marketing on Twitter: someone called @AcademeJobs started following my tweets (@sabinehikel). I checked out theirs. There’s some good stuff there–not job postings, exactly, but links to articles on the politics of higher education. Then I clicked on the home page for this tweeter, and it turns out to be Academe Jobs, a site I’ve never heard of before (have you?). I’m not endorsing the site, but I am letting you know that it exists, because I know there is a segment of my readership that hasn’t yet given up on the academic job search. It appears as though there are listing for both the US and Canada, as well as for faculty, admin and “executive jobs” (what the heck is that in the context of a university?).

I have to say, though, that nothing I’ve ever seen in the world of academic job listings beats the nifty little Dual Career Search tool over at Inside Higher Ed. Sure, this doesn’t apply to everyone, but for those two-scholar households, this little search mechanism makes it a heck of a lot easier to find academic work in the same time zone for both of you.

And now, back to our regularly scheduled non-academic programming.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 0 comments }

Money by Joshua DavisI got an email recently from a reader who pointed out that most of my podcast interviewees were people who could quite literally afford to step off the academic career path because they had each had a partner who could support them financially.

It’s true that I have interviewed a lot of academics who transitioned out of academia while having a partner (or, in some cases, a parent) who earned enough money to cover things until stable employment was secured. And it’s true that not everyone is in this situation. If you’re single, or if your partner is also an academic whose labour is cheap, you are not in a position to just up and quit without a plan. That’s it. Bottom line.

So, if you want to quit academia, I guess you need a plan, then.

But even if you want to stay in academia, you’re gonna need a plan, too; I bet that the number of people currently in your cohort at your institution vastly exceed the number of jobs advertised in your field in the entire country (US or Canada, you choose) this year.

Either way, grad students (and the post-docs, contract faculty and full-time faculty who dream of a different life) are currently in a situation where they (feel they) have to simultaneously work their butts off to gain their academic credentials (publishing, primarily) and create contingency plans for non-academic jobs. This is one of the many things that makes academic career-changers different from other career changers: the requirements of grooming yourself for two different streams of career change are quite separate, without a lot of overlap.

One thing academics do share with any other worker who is looking for a job is the basic fact that the more lead time you have to create a plan for your career change, the better (don’t hate me for stating the obvious). But the thing with academia is that there are so many stages where your exit from the profession is built right in to your role. If you’re a grad student, you’re going to graduate from your program at some point (or, depending on your situation, you’ll be shown the door). If you’re contract faculty, maybe you won’t get enough courses to teach. If you’re faculty, maybe you won’t get tenure. Those are all moments when you’re faced with an opportunity to stay in or get out. So your lead time for creating your plan may be limited, depending upon where on academia’s ladder of precarious employment you sit.

These are the realities. But the overarching philosophy of this blog has always been to illustrate that there is life after academia, even if that immediate stage after leaving is rocky and scary. Whether you choose to leave academia or are forced out, whether you have time to plan your transition or not, whether you have a partner to support you or unpaid bills stacked up on your desk, you are faced with two new research projects: ways to make money, and a path into a new career. Ideally, these two things will coincide, but for people who leave academia without a partner’s support, making money may have to come before the fab new career.

Dog-walking, house-cleaning, working for a parent and temping are some of the ways academics I’ve met have paid the bills while figuring out the next step. Taking jobs that only take advantage of one set of skills–like transcribing or taking notes for disabled students–are also other ways people I know have transitioned out of academe before settling into other careers. In my own case, I took a job as a closed captioning editor at a national broadcaster as a way of grooming my English skills, moving back into media/communications and earning a steady paycheque–even though the work took advantage of very few of my analytical skills (which was a very, very welcome relief at first).

I’m not advocating for a blind jump from the ivory tower and I’m not denying that finding a job and changing careers is as difficult as surviving grad school. What I have always maintained, through this blog, is the belief that there is life after academia. When you’re on the inside, the prospect of leaving seems, at times, both foolish and impossible. But the idea of not making a plan, in the current economic climate, seems equally foolish, and the execution is actually very, very possible.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 8 comments }

Work Hair by Evil ErinYesterday, I had a great phone chat with Paula Chambers, whose name you may know from the WRK4US listserv. Paula and I were yakking about all things post-academic when it dawned on me why, exactly, I like the phrase “post-academic.” More specifically, I finally clued in as to why I’ve never, ever used the expression “alternative careers.”

My reason? The idea that doing anything with a PhD other than replicating the professoriate — that is, taking on a so-called “alternative career” — only reinforces the belief that taking a faculty job is the norm. The phrase “alternative career” suggests a deviation (in the many sense of the word) from the acceptable mainstream. This is, of course, complete and utter bullshit. MAs, ABDs and PhDs have long been exiting academia and going into any and all other fields (or, in some cases, giving up paid work altogether and focussing on raising a family). And yet the belief that graduate training only qualifies you for one career path persists. The phrase “alternative careers,” IMHO, reinforces that.

As I type this, I have a vague feeling that I may be echoing what Susan Basalla and Maggie Debelius write about the issue in “So What Are You Going to do With That?”: Finding Careers Outside Academia. To me, their use of the phrase “post-academic career” rather than “alternative career” always seemed like the most respectful and accurate way of looking at the career trajectories of people coming out of academia. Over at Carolyn Steele’s Career Sense blog, she mentions that the University of Chicago is now using the phrase “post-graduate career.” This sounds nice, but some people leaving Ph.D. programs do so without parchment in hand. Sure, they are graduates of a Master’s degree. But I think “post-graduate” isn’t all-encompassing enough–plus there’s all that confusion with the UK and their definition of “post-graduate.”

But what do you think?

What kind of career are you imagining or building for yourself?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 10 comments }

Superhero job hunting by hillary hI’ve just come across a few more resources I wanted to share with everyone. This first one is something that Canadian job searchers may already know about is new to me. It’s a job search engine called Eluta (or I suppose it’s eluta, without the capitalization, but c’mon, people, isn’t that kind of ’90s?). From my brief poke around the site, it looks like a very smart way of organizing job search information; best of all, you can search for jobs offered by Canada’s top employers, the best employers for diversity, the greenest employers, etc. So it looks like a really nifty way implementing your values into the job search. Coolio, eh?

The other thing I’ve been meaning to share with you is this article at The Ladders (you may have to become a free member to access the piece) called “12 Daily Habits to Boost Your Hire-Ability.” The article, by Scott Ginsberg, has such sensible, practical advice that really applies to post-academic job searchers. Among his suggestions? “Be radically honest” (i.e. make sure everyone in your life, from your hair dresser to your dissertation supervisor, knows that you’re job hunting. Okay, maybe not your supervisor. But you know what I mean), start a blog, get up an hour earlier, etc.

What kind of daily practice have you instituted for your post-academic job search? Anything that you think might help others?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 4 comments }

Briefcase Cake by DahliascakesBy now, my philosophy of career search/job hunting is probably starting to become pretty clear on this blog: I’m all about doing what you’re interested in and passionate about, not restricting yourself to lines of work that are dictated by the confines of your scholarly discipline. That’s why I haven’t spent a lot of time writing about companies that hire Ph.D.s. To me, most medium-to-large companies and organizations probably have a whole host of MAs and PhDs running around, simply because those people were drawn to that work, and happened to have some solid skills to make them a good fit.

But I do want to draw your attention to McKinsey & Company, a global consulting company. McKinsey doesn’t just hire MBAs; in fact, according to their website, 22% of their workforce are PhDs and MDs. They actually make a point of hiring people from a broad range of backgrounds. Yes, your PhD is an asset here.

I mentioned McKinsey to a client last week, and she drew my attention this super handy little section of their website: videos that actually spell out for you how to do well in an interview with McKinsey. How cool is that? And there’s a bit of humour in there, too–I think around the 2-minute mark in the “Experience interview” video, a PhD (or HR person playing one) starts talking about his grant application as proof of his leadership skills and…let’s just say there are some lessons in there!

And as per my previous post, McKinsey also has flexible work arrangements for good performers. (Though I do believe they also have a reputation for their people working incredibly long hours, so maybe the flexi stuff happens after you’ve established yourself. I’m not sure).

I do not know how McKinsey has fared in the global economic meltdown. But I do believe this little paragraph (by subscription) I read over at The Ladders last week:

When companies tell you they aren’t hiring because of the recession, don’t believe them. What they mean to say is that during a recession they are very, very discerning about who they hire and who they keep on their team. However, every company is always hiring as long as they believe they are getting an amazingly talented person who fits well within their culture.

Is management consulting you would consider doing?  If you’ve watched the McKinsey vids, what did you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 6 comments }

Canadian flag by futureatlasIt’s Canada Day here north of the 49th parallel. I know that when I was a grad student, every day was a work day, including civic holidays. Now that I’m out of academia, plus self-employed, plus a mom, I carve out very deliberate boundaries with my time (this has sometimes been difficult for people who would rather I conducted business outside of my M-F, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 pm work schedule!).

Because today is a holiday, I’m going to be hanging out with my crack I.T. team and our child, trying to find a fun activity to do out of the impending rain. But I offer to you a  collection of links sent in from readers this week:

Happy Canada Day, Canadians!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 5 comments }

Colour Your Life by Capture QueenOne thing that’s been obvious to me since I started this project was how much the academics I’m in touch with having a longing to be relevant and useful in the world. So many of us have gone into higher education because we thought the world needed more great ideas, or because teaching was a way of creating social change, or because we ourselves wanted to understand the world’s problems better before trying to tackle them.

But when the realities of academic life sink in–that there is little time for activism when funding proposals need to be written, little time to engage students meaningfully when you’re limited to 50 minutes a week of dull curriculum–ambitions to change the world get thwarted. But that longing to make a social contribution doesn’t go away. It just gets buried.

For those who do dream of/think about/consider leaving academia, it’s often that call to be useful in the world that leads the way. Working in isolation on research papers that no one will read is the antithesis, for many, of making a social contribution. As a result, I hear from clients and blog readers who are looking for the right kind of work where they can make an impact (right now, actually, I’m working with two different U.S. clients who are applying for really cool sounding jobs that are precisely in the field of knowledge mobilization, even though that phrase isn’t explicitly used in the job ads).

Some people look to the government (local, provincial/state, federal) to do that kind of work. Others look to think tanks. Some try entrepreneurship. And there are gobs of grassroots nonprofits and highflying NGOs, too. (NB: If you’re Canadian and are interested in this kind of work, check out CharityVillage.com. If you’re American, try out Idealist.org. And if you’re not from North America, please let me know of any resources that serve as clearinghouses for jobs available in the non-profit sector).

Lately, I’ve been hearing more and more about two really interesting areas for people who want to have and make an impact. One is “social innovation” or “social entrepreneurship.” The other is “knowledge mobilization.” Here in Toronto, we have something called the Centre for Social Innovation, an incredible (and incredibly beautiful) shared workspace for over 180 different organizations, each of them committed to creating positive social change. We’re not talking about armchair activists, here–we’re talking about organizations like Bikes Without Borders, the Pembina Institute, and the David Suzuki Foundation. These are the people who put their money where their mouth is and make change happen. They are, in the parlance I am only now learning, change agents.

Social entrepreneurs, I have also learned, are entrepreneurs who are interested in makign a profit, sure–but doing so through social innovation. Their work lies not only in making money, but in creating value like trust, connections, community, capacity-building, and so forth. The first time I’d heard the phrase social entrepreneur was from someone I met at Congress who runs this company.

This brings me to this thing called knowledge mobilization. The more people I talk to about this, the more I learn that either you work in a sector where knowledge mobilization (or knowledge transfer, knowledge exchange, and apparently endless variations on the same) is a given, or you’ve never heard of this crazy thing. When I was at Congress, though, and heard knowledge mobilization defined as “making what we know ready for service or action to build value,” my ears pricked up. How appealing this would be, I thought, to so many of the academics I’m in touch with who have a longing to take their knowledge and research and make it meaningful and useful to the world.

Social innovation and knowledge mobilization are fields that need people who understand the ins and outs of research, but who are interested in applying it to the world. And that might be you. There is so much research that has already been done that could make a difference–but instead, it sits in journals, not being, well, mobilized. Maybe you are someone who could work with others to bring that research to life.

Now, if you’re getting excited about this as a possible career trajectory for yourself, that’s awesome. But I’m going to link to kind of a downer of an article about social entrepreneurship. The only reason why I’m doing that, though, is because although the piece complains that a lot of people are excluded from the “social entrepreneurship club” (and that includes people who don’t have M.B.A.s), the piece (and the comments section) includes a litany of organizations who do this kind of work. It could be a starting place for those who are interested in researching the people and places who have the money to create social change (and perhaps some organizations to avoid). And seriously, in my world, not having an M.B.A. means nothing. With the right networking, the right resume and an endless source of persistence, a Ph.D. can absolutely be leveraged where you’d assume an M.B.A. would be preferred. M’kay? The link to the piece is here.

Have you thought about the path of social innovation? What kinds of foundations or organizations have you researched that appeal to your social justice instincts? Would you ever consider social entrepreneurship for yourself?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

{ 1 comment }